How to Avoid Mrsa and Staph at Gym

J Environ Public Health. 2018; 2018: 4592830.

High Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Fitness Equipment from Selected Gymnasiums

Lesley Maurice Bilung

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

Ahmad Syatir Tahar

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

Rosdi Kira

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

Aina Ariffah Mohd Rozali

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

Kasing Apun

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

Received 2018 Mar 29; Revised 2018 Jul 17; Accepted 2018 Aug 2.

Abstract

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of cutaneous bacterial infection involving community.

Methods

In this study, a total of 42 swab samples were collected from the surface of various fitness equipment such as back machines, exercise mats, dip stations, dumbbells, and treadmills. Identification of the bacterial isolates was conducted using biochemical tests and further analysed molecularly using the PCR method targeting nuc gene (270 bp). The nuc gene encodes for the thermonuclease enzyme, a virulent factor of S. aureus.

Results

The findings showed 31 out of 42 swab samples (73.81%) were positive with S. aureus.

Conclusion

This study showed that gymnasium equipment is a potential reservoir for S. aureus and might play an important role in transmitting the pathogen to humans.

Objective

This study was undertaken to assess the presence of S. aureus on the surface of fitness equipment from selected gymnasiums in Kuching and Kota Samarahan, Sarawak (Malaysia).

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive and nonmotile cocci bacterium that is most common in soft tissue and skin infection [1]. Within the genus, there are 39 valid species. Animal and human pathogenic species include S. aureus, S. intermedius, S. delphini, S. hyicus, S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans, S. pseudintermedius, S. equorum, S. xylosus, S. carnosus, S. simulans, S. saprophyticus, S. succinus, S. warneri, S. vitulinus, S. pasteuri, S. epidermidis, and S. lentus [2]. S. aureus is a normal microflora of the skin, nose, and mucous membrane of humans where colonisation is more common than infection. Skin infection can occur if the cutaneous barrier is disrupted or damaged [3]. Any individuals that have been colonised by the bacteria are susceptible to any consequential infections and worse among patients of type 1 diabetes, intravenous drug users, patients undergoing haemodialysis, surgical patients, and patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [4].

The spectrum of clinical manifestations can be from minor skin infections to life-threatening illnesses. Skin infections include pimples, impetigo, boils (furuncles), cellulitis, folliculitis, carbuncles, scalded skin syndrome, and abscesses, while life-threatening illnesses include pneumonia, meningitis, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, toxic shock syndrome (TSS), bacteremia, and sepsis [5]. Procurement of skin infection is predominantly via skin contact with infected surfaces. The common high-risk groups are nursery children, patients in hospitals, prisoners, athletes, and military personnel [6, 7].

There are two trends of S. aureus infection. First is the increase of cases in community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) infection as they increased the use of intravascular devices. The second trend is highly selective antibiotic resistance which increases the infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [4]. MRSA is an emerging strain of S. aureus that is resistant to several antibiotics acquired by mecA, a methicillin-resistant gene [6]. The strain was firstly discovered by Barrett et al. [8] at Boston City Hospital, nine years upon methicillin was introduced in the treatment of penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MRSA produces similar clinical conditions as the MSSA infection but requires more aggressive antimicrobial therapy since it is highly resistant to many antibiotics. MRSA infections are related to football, fencing, rugby, wrestling, cross-country, soccer, volleyball, basketball, and weight lifting [9]. In Malaysia, the first case of infection was reported in the 1970s [10].

Up to the present time, no published studies on S. aureus from gymnasiums, sport facilities, or even athletes have been conducted in Malaysia. However, several studies on the presence of S. aureus have been reported on football teams [11–15], basketball teams [14], rugby teams [16], weight lifters [9] and wrestling teams [17]. Despite the high occurrence of S. aureus in sport facilities, studies taking place in Malaysia are still lacking. This study was conducted to assess the presence of S. aureus on the surface of fitness equipment from the selected gymnasiums in Kuching and Kota Samarahan, Sarawak (Malaysia).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 3 selected gymnasiums located in Kota Samarahan and Kuching were identified as displayed in Figure 1, and sampling was conducted within the period of July 2016–January 2017. A total of 14 swab samples were collected from each gymnasium and analysed by following the swab method as in William et al. [18]. By using sterile cotton swabs, surfaces of sport equipment such as dumbbells, kettlebells, exercise mats, treadmills, dip stations, and back machines were swabbed and stored in individual sterile universal bottles containing phosphate-buffered saline. Afterwards, the bottles were placed in an ice box and transported to the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, for further analysis.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is JEPH2018-4592830.001.jpg

A map of gymnasiums involved in this study. Gymnasiums A and B were located in Kota Samarahan, while gymnasium C was located at BDC in Kuching.

2.2. Biochemical Tests

Detection of S. aureus using the biochemical test was in accordance with the method of William et al. [18]. All swab samples were streaked on the selective Baird-Parker agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Presumptive growth of S. aureus was detected based on the formation of black and clear zones of colonies on the agar plates as shown in Figure 2. Three colonies from each plate were picked and used in Gram staining and catalase test, a test that can distinguish S. aureus from other catalase-negative staphylococci.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is JEPH2018-4592830.002.jpg

Formation of black colonies surrounded with clear zones indicating Staphylococcus aureus on the Baird-Parker agar.

2.3. DNA Extraction

DNA extraction was performed using the boiled cell method by Fitrianda et al. [19] with a little modification. The isolates were grown in the Luria-Bertani agar at 37°C for 24 hr. Subsequently, 1 ml of the culture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min. The pellets were resuspended in 500μl sterile distilled water and followed with vortexing. The suspension was boiled at 100°C for 2 min and promptly chilled on ice for 15 min. The suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was used for PCR analysis.

2.4. Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Molecular analysis using specific PCR was performed in accordance with the method of Ali et al. [20]. A primer pair targeting nuc gene was used (nuc-F: 5′-GCGATTGATGGTGATACGGTT-3′; nuc-R: 5′-AGCCAAGCCTTGAACGAACTAAAGC-3′). 25µl of the reaction mixture consisted of 1x Green GoTaq Flexi buffer (Promega, United States), 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.5 mM of each dNTP, 10 mM of each primer, 1.25 U of GoTaq DNA Polymerase (Promega, United States), and 20–30 ng of DNA template. The PCR reaction was carried out with initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 37 cycles each of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a cycle of final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Positive and negative controls were included. Amplified fragment analysis was done in 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. A 100 bp molecular weight DNA ladder was included (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The gel was viewed under a UV transilluminator (Maestrogen, Taiwan).

3. Results

3.1. Biochemical Test

Black colonies on the Baird-Parker agar indicated presence of the S. aureus morphological characteristic. As shown in Table 1, presumptive S. aureus detection using the Baird-Parker agar, Gram staining, and catalase test revealed gymnasium A had the highest number of positive isolates (14/14; 100%), followed by gymnasium B (13/14; 92.86%) and gymnasium C (4/14; 28.57%). These numbers were in tandem with confirmation using the PCR assay targeting nuc gene (270 bp). A representative of agarose gel electrophoresis is shown in Figure 3.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is JEPH2018-4592830.003.jpg

Representative of agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR amplification products from seven isolates of S. aureus. Lane M: 100 bp molecular weight DNA ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States); lane 1: positive control of S. aureus; lane 2: negative control; lanes 3 to 11: sample isolates from the gymnasiums.

Table 1

Biochemical tests and PCR assay on all the samples from gymnasiums A, B, and C.

Gymnasium Location Formation of black colonies growing on the Baird-Parker agara Gram staining Positive reaction to the catalase testa PCR assay targeting nuc genea
A Kota Samarahan 14/14 14 Gram positive 14/14 14/14
B Kota Samarahan 14/14 13 Gram positive 13/14 13/14
C BDC in Kuching 11/14 4 Gram positive 4/14 4/14
Total 39/42 (92.9%) 31 Gram positive (73.8%) 31/42 (73.8%) 31/42 (73.8%)

4. Discussion

High occurrence of S. aureus was detected from gymnasiums A and B, compared to gymnasium C. It was noted that gymnasium C was open for 24 hours and had twice-a-day disinfection (i.e., morning and night), whereas gymnasium A and B were open only during working hours and had once-a-day disinfection before closing. Based on CDC [21], disinfectants effective against MSSA can be used for MRSA. A list of many approved disinfectants is available on the US EPA [22] website where the public can check for application. Household chlorine bleach may also be used, but the persons must pay attention to the instruction, dilution, and exposure time for ensuring an effective disinfection [23]. Bacteria on sport equipment can persist if topical disinfectant is applied that cannot penetrate deeper into interstices of the surface [24].

The current finding obtained a high number of samples positive for S. aureus (73.8%). The potential of MRSA could contaminate gymnasium equipment and would be equal to that of MSSA [25] which should receive attention by the public and owners. Circulation of S. aureus in the gymnasium area was also reported by Cohen [26] where three weight lifters from the University of Houston were infected with MRSA, who eventually recovered after several treatments which were incision and drainage, sensitivity-directed antibiotic therapy, topical mupirocin, and cleansing with an antibacterial agent (povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine). Other pathogens can also be isolated from gymnasium equipment such as in a study by Goldhammer et al. [24] that found diphtheroids, Gram-positive cocci, Bacillus species, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Micrococcus species, and culturable virus from two fitness centres.

Many studies have been conducted to assess any risk factors associated with the infection among athletes. For instance, a study by Kazakova et al. [27] found that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection was frequent among footballers (35/84; 42%), where they reported the risks were worsened by several factors, for example: the games were conducted on artificial turf instead grass, hand sanitisers were limited, alcohol-based medication was not given during wound care, sharing towels, players did not take shower before using whirlpools, and training and therapy equipment was not disinfected periodically. Nevertheless, these factors may vary depending on the athlete behaviours and facility.

Gymnasium trainers play a crucial role in controlling the spread of MRSA within the facility. Based on the study by Rihn et al. [1], athletic trainers and therapists must be alert for MRSA infection among athletes, be able to identify skin lesions susceptible to MRSA infection, adhere to the knowledge that culturing infectious lesions is important in making accurate diagnosis and subsequent antibiotic treatment, cover infectious lesions with a clean and dry dressing until they are healed, encourage athletes to cover any risky areas from injury and cover skin injury with a clean, dry dressing, educate athletes on CA-MRSA illness and hygienic practices, and produce reports to local infectious disease specialists or CDC on incidences of CA-MRSA infection. This current study detected S. aureus utilising PCR primers targeting nuc gene, a unique marker used widely in S. aureus detection in food and clinical samples. The gene encodes for the thermonuclease enzyme in the bacteria, a virulent factor that hydrolyses DNA and RNA of infected cells [28]. Utilisation of the gene allows rapid detection of S. aureus [20].

Limitations faced in this study were small sample size and that this study is not specifically focused on MRSA detection which would be significant to determine any potential level of S. aureus-causing skin infections. Several gymnasiums in Kuching and Kota Samarahan were reluctant to permit sample collection being carried out on their equipment due to some issues (i.e., trust and concern over hygienic practice) among the customers that they may be affected. The small sample size in this study is not representative of the whole gymnasiums in Kuching and Kota Samarahan. However, it provides preliminary assessment of high occurrence of S. aureus on equipment from the selected gymnasiums.

5. Conclusion

This study revealed a relatively high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus on the surface of the gymnasium equipment from the selected gymnasiums in Kuching and Kota Samarahan. As this is the first one of such reports in Malaysia, more studies are important to provide more insight into MRSA strains from the local gymnasiums. Although no cases have been reported regarding S. aureus infections within gymnasiums in the country, the public and gymnasium owners need to practice good hygiene and sanitisation to avoid any infections which potentially cause an outbreak in the future.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to the owners of the selected gymnasiums in Kuching and Kota Samarahan who gave permission to carry out sample collection in this study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

1. Rihn J. A., Michaels M. G., Harner C. D. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;33(12):1924–1929. doi: 10.1177/0363546505283273. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Blaiotta G., Fusco V., Ercolini D., Pepe O., Coppola S. Diversity of Staphylococcus species strains based on partial kat (catalase) gene sequences and design of a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay for identification and differentiation of coagulase-positive species (S. aureus, S. delphini, S. hyicus, S. intermedius, S. pseudintermedius, and S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans) Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2010;48(1):192–201. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00542-09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Chambers H. F. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2001;7(2):178–182. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Lowy F. D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339(8):520–532. doi: 10.1056/nejm199808203390806. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Shekhawat K. K., Rao D. V., Batra A. In vitro antimicrobial activities of endophytic fungi isolate from medicinal Tree-Melia azedarach L. Journal of Microbiology Research. 2013;3(1):19–24. [Google Scholar]

6. Enright M. C., Robinson D. A., Randle G., Feil E. J., Grundmann H., Spratt B. G. The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(11):7687–7692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122108599. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Jernigan J. A., Arnold K., Heilpern K., Kainer M., Woods C., Hughes J. M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as community pathogen. Proceedings of Symposium on Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; May 2006; Atlanta, GA, USA. [Google Scholar]

8. Barrett F. F., McGehee R. F., Jr., Finland M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Boston City Hospital: bacteriologic and epidemiologic observations. New England Journal of Medicine. 1968;279(9):441–448. doi: 10.1056/nejm196808292790901. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Kirkland E. B., Adams B. B. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and athletes. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2008;59(3):494–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.04.016. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Lim V. K. E., Zulkifli H. I. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Malaysian neonatal unit. Singapore Medical Journal. 1987;28(2):176–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Bartlett P. C., Martin R. J., Cahill B. R. Furunculosis in a high school football team. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1982;10(6):371–374. doi: 10.1177/036354658201000611. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Rihn J. A., Posfay-Barbe K., Harner C. D., et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a local high school football team unsuccessful interventions. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2005;24(9):841–843. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000177287.11971.d4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Romano R., Lu D., Holtom P. Outbreak of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections among a collegiate football team. Journal of Athletic Training. 2006;41(2):141–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Sosin D. M., Gunn R. A., Ford W. L., Skaggs J. W. An outbreak of furunculosis among high school athletes. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1989;17(6):828–832. doi: 10.1177/036354658901700618. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Huijsdens X. W., Van Lier A. M., Van Kregten E., et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Dutch soccer team. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006;12(10):1584–1586. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Stacey A. R., Endersby K. E., Chan P. C., Marples R. R. An outbreak of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a rugby football team. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 1998;32(2):153–154. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.2.153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Lindenmayer J. M., Schoenfeld S., O'grady R., Carney J. K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school wrestling team and the surrounding community. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1998;158(8):895–899. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.8.895. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. William J. L., Radu S., Aziz S. A., et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus carriage by young Malaysian footballers during indoor training. British Journal of Sport Medicine. 2003;38(1):12–14. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.000653. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Fitrianda E., Marlina M., Mukhtar M. H. Isolation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from beef marketed in Padang, identification targeted on gene and amplification of tdh and trh genes on isolates using polymerase chain reaction. Scientia. 2011;1:8–13. [Google Scholar]

20. Ali R., Al-Achkar K., Al-Mariri A., Safi M. Role of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the detection of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2014;15(3):293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmhg.2014.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Goldhammer K. A., Dooley D. P., Ayala E., Zera W., Hill B. L. Prospective study of bacterial and viral contamination of exercise equipment. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2006;16(1):34–38. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000181436.41268.1f. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Markley J. D., Edmond M. B., Major Y., Bearman G., Stevens M. P. Are gymnasium surfaces reservoirs for Staphylococcus aureus? A point prevalence survey. American Journal of Infection Control. 2012;40(10):1008–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Cohen P. R. Cutaneous community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in participants of athletic activities. Southern Medical Journal. 2005;98(6):596–602. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000163302.72469.28. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Kazakova S. V., Hageman J. C., Matava M., et al. A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional football players. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(5):468–475. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa042859. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Hu Y., Meng J., Shi C., Hervin K., Fratamico P. M., Shi X. Characterization and comparative analysis of a second thermonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiological Research. 2013;168(3):174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.09.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

How to Avoid Mrsa and Staph at Gym

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6136567/

0 Response to "How to Avoid Mrsa and Staph at Gym"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel